Showing posts with label #OccupyOakland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #OccupyOakland. Show all posts

Sunday, December 18, 2016

09 Oakland Mayor Schaaf Violates Oakland's Crowd Control Policies (attempt to prohibit night protests)

May 2015
Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf Institutes Ban On Nighttime Street Protests



The rally began just before sunset in Frank Ogawa Plaza where about 200–300 people had gathered. After several speeches and recitations of poetry, the protesters announced their intention to march to the Oakland Police Administration Building seven blocks away. Demonstrators had not yet stepped off the sidewalk and into the intersection of 14th Street and Broadway when OPD addressed the crowd through an amplified sound system, stating that the march was “unpermitted.” As demonstrators walked into the street, police immediately ordered them back onto the sidewalk, citing California Vehicle Code Section 2800, which makes it an arrestable offense to not comply with orders of a police officer.

“The fact is we were threatened with arrest for marching,” said Cat Brooks, one of the facilitators of the protest. “This was a Black women’s and children’s rally saying to the police, please stop killing us, and our woman mayor organized the harshest response we’ve seen yet.”

“There clearly is a shift in tactics by the police,” said attorney Anne Weills, who was in last night’s march.


In an interview today, Mayor Libby Schaaf acknowledged that she ordered the prohibition on nighttime street marches in Oakland. However, she argued that it was a not new city law, but rather a reinterpretation of an existing one. 

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/SevenDays/archives/2015/05/22/oakland-mayor-libby-schaaf-institutes-curfew-on-nighttime-street-protest




May 2012

Oakland's Mayor violates Oakland's Crowd Control Policies in violation of Federal Oversight rules

OPD’s current crowd control policy, Lye explained, is pursuant to a court settlement reached in the 2003 Port of Oakland incident, during which Oakland police fired wooden dowels and shotgun-propelled bean bags into a crowd of protestors, injuring 58 people. For that reason, she said, “OPD does not have unilateral authority to change that [policy].” Instead, she said, “they are required to consult with a monitor” before announcing any revisions.

Because OPD’s existing crowd control guidelines were part of a federal court order and are still legally binding, the department doesn’t “have the power to make any changes in that unilaterally,” added Rachel Lederman, an NLG attorney.

Even more confusing to some is the fact that a few weeks ago, Lederman said, OPD “inexplicably” posted the Peace Officer Standards and Training - or POST - crowd control guidelines on its website, even though it already lists the existing guidelines as its official policy. Furthermore, the city’s press release made additional mention of new guidelines, stating that OPD is “revising its crowd management policy to be consistent with upcoming POST-recommended crowd management policies.”

http://newamericamedia.org/2012/05/was-oakland-pds-proposed-crowd-control-policy-illegal.php

May 2015

"Black People Had War Declared on Them By Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf."

On Thursday, May 21st, 2015, Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, in response to window breaking during protests the evening of May 1st, promulgated, secretly, new edicts prohibiting night time street protests.  These were enforced by Oakland Police that night when Black Lives Matter protesters attempted to take to the streets after a #SayHerName rally remembering Black women killed by police terror.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/5/24/1387348/--Black-People-Had-War-Declared-on-Them-By-Oakland-Mayor-Libby-Schaaf

May 2015

Oakland protesters defy mayor by marching at night without permit

Protesters marched through Oakland streets after sunset Saturday in defiance of Mayor Libby Schaaf’s policy of shutting down unlawful assemblies at night in her effort to protect businesses from protest-related violence and vandalism.

The protest was organized in response to an incident Thursday night in which police forced about 200 demonstrators off the street and onto the sidewalk because they did not have a permit to shut down city streets. The groups Onyx Organizing Committee and the Anti Police-Terror Project complied but called the city’s action unconstitutional, and planned Saturday night’s march to challenge what they called a new policy.

On Friday, Schaaf spokeswoman Erica Derryck released a statement saying the city hasn’t approved any new laws or policies regarding marches, but is using existing laws and policies to make sure protests remain peaceful. She said routing the march onto the sidewalk is a way to “ensure that freedom of expression is not compromised by unlawful activity and demonstrators, bystanders, motorists and property are kept safe.”

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-protesters-to-challenge-Libby-Schaaf-in-6283517.php


June 2015

Oakland officials, lawyers can’t resolve city’s controversial crowd control policy

“She’s (Schaaf) writing checks she expect my police officers to cash,” said Donelan, whose union is currently negotiating a new contract. “This administration will persecute Oakland police for their own failed policy.”

“This is a failed policy, failed leadership and ultimately the people who will suffer are the citizens of Oakland,” Donelan said. “Are we putting murderers behind bars? I’m not sure what we’re achieving.”

http://www.mercurynews.com/2015/06/03/oakland-officials-lawyers-cant-resolve-citys-controversial-crowd-control-policy/


CBS San Francisco reports that police cited a new policy by the city's mayor to force protesters from the street to the sidewalk after Oakland experienced several violent demonstrations in the past year. Oakland has hosted rallies in the streets for years, but the mayor said the new policy is needed to combat damage to property and violence.

Rachel Lederman, a lawyer with the National Lawyers Guild who helped Oakland craft its crowd-control policies, said the new tactics appear to violate the guidelines.

"It doesn't make any sense because saying that marches have to be on the sidewalk has absolutely no relationship to impending property damage that might occur," Lederman said. "Obviously that would happen on a sidewalk, not a street."

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-oakland-police-policy-sparks-protests-arrests/

Oakland Police Under a Cloud for Violent Occupy Crackdown

October 2011

Questions are swirling as to whether Oakland police used excessive force and violated the department's own crowd-control policy. The OPD denies that Oakland officers used flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets against the crowd, despite allegations to the contrary. (OPD spokespeople suggested that other law enforcement agencies may have used them.) Interim police chief Howard Jordan has admitted to the use of tear gas and bean bags, saying his officers used them as a defense against bottles, rocks, and paint thrown by angry protesters.

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/10/opd-crowd-control-policy-force




http://www.mercurynews.com/2015/05/26/legal-or-not-oaklands-new-protest-policy-hurting-relations-with-activists/

08 Oakland Police Dept (OPD) - $2m settlement after attacking dozens of Antiwar protesters (2003)

April 2013

Oakland Paid $2 Million Settlement After Attacking Dozens Of Antiwar Protesters 


In April 2003, the department violently cracked down on raucous Iraq war demonstrations, attacking protesters with concussion grenades, “sting balls,” and other similar weapons:

An anti-war demonstration at the Port of Oakland turned violent this morning when Oakland Police opened fire with wooden dowels, “sting balls,’” concussion grendades, tear gas and other non-lethal weapons when protesters at the gates of two shipping lines refused an order to disperse. Scores of protesters ran from a line of police or tried to hide behind nearby big rigs. 

At least a dozen demonstrators and nine longshoremen who were standing nearby were injured.

“Our guys were standing in one area waiting to go to work, and then the police started firing on the longshoremen,’” said Henry Graham, the president of ILWU Local 10. “Some were hit in the chest with rubber bullets, and seven of our guys went to the hospital. I don’t want to imply that the police deliberately did this, but it doesn’t make sense.”


https://thinkprogress.org/flashback-oakland-paid-2-million-settlement-after-attacking-dozens-of-antiwar-protesters-in-2003-8c8ac1392f4d#.lv5ut7kfy

05 Oakland Police Department - repeatedly violates its own crowd control policies

More than 1,000 complaints have been filed over the OPD's handing of various Occupy Oakland protests, according to the East Bay Express. The OPD has repeatedly violated its own crowd-control policy, which was adopted following an aggressive response to a 2003 antiwar protest that resulted in lawsuits that cost the department more than $2 million. OPD Chief Howard Jordan, who was a lieutenant at the time, was involved in policing that protest and was deposed during the ensuing investigation. In both cases, the heavy-handed tactics centered on the use of "less-lethal" projectiles, such as the beanbag round that later injured Scott Olsen. The Frazier report said such weapons should be replaced with "state of the art equipment that will reduce injuries" and "help prevent property damage."

Oakland Police Dept Crowd Control Policy

https://localwiki.org/oakland/OPD_Crowd_Control_Policy

July 2012

How OPD Violates Their Crowd Control Policy.. Again & Again
http://www.beortamedia.com/bellas-corner/how-opd-violates-their-crowd-control-policy-again-again


August 2013

Timeline: A History of Oakland Police's Crowd-Control Policy 

Jan. 22, 2003: The City of Oakland pays $10.9 million in the Allen v. City of Oakland (Riders case) settlement to 119 plaintiffs who alleged police misconduct.

April 7, 2003: At an anti-war protest at the Port of Oakland, at least 57 demonstrators, including Sri Louise Coles and longshoremen, are injured.

June 26, 2003: Sri Louise Coles, the longshoremen's union, and other plaintiffs file suit against the city, setting in motion the beginnings of OPD's crowd-control policy.

Aug. 20, 2003: The District Court appoints an independent monitoring team to oversee the reforms required by the Riders settlement.

Oct. 28, 2005: The OPD crowd-control policy is finalized on Dec. 20, 2004, and issued in a training bulletin by the OPD.

Dec. 28, 2007: Federal court oversight of the crowd-control policy expires.

Jan. 1, 2009: Oscar Grant is killed. His death sparks protests and riots in Oakland.

Nov. 5, 2010: in the killing of Oscar Grant. OPD unlawfully arrests approximately 150 demonstrators.

June 13, 2011: In Spalding et al v. City of Oakland, the National Lawyers Guild files suit on behalf of the 150 arrested demonstrators.

Oct. 25, 2011: OPD clears the Occupy Oakland encampment at Frank Ogawa Plaza, resulting in injuries and unlawful arrests.

Nov. 2, 2011: OPD responds violently to an Occupy Oakland "General Strike" protest: Suzi Spangenberg is hit with grenades and shot with less-lethal munitions; Scott Campbell is shot in the upper thigh with a beanbag round; Kayvan Sabeghi is beaten.

Nov. 14, 2011: The NLG and the ACLU file suit on behalf of those injured and arrested on the nights of Oct. 25 and Nov. 2.

Jan. 24, 2012: The District Court finds OPD has failed to comply with the terms of the Riders settlement. OPD is on the brink of federal receivership; the department is stripped of independence and put under direct supervision and control of a compliance director, Thomas Frazier.

Jan. 28, 2012: OPD arrests 400 demonstrators. A case filed on behalf of those arrested is ongoing.

June 14, 2012: OPD's compliance director Frazier releases an investigative report into the department's response to Occupy Oakland, criticizing OPD's crowd-control and use-of-force practices.

June 24, 2013: Spalding et al v. City of Oakland settles for $1.025 million.

July 3, 2013: Campbell et al v. City of Oakland settles for $1.17 million. As part of the Spalding and Campbell settlements, the crowd-control policy is placed back under court supervision for four years, which can be expanded to seven years if violations occur.

http://archives.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco/timeline-a-history-of-oakland-polices-crowd-control-policy/Content?oid=2827010




06 Oakland Police Dept (OPD) - OPD investigator compromised the Scott Olsen criminal investigation

June 2012

OPD Screws Up Scott Olsen Investigation?

A new report reveals that a department investigator may have compromised the investigation into the shooting of the Marine veteran.

Filings made last week in the court of federal Judge Thelton Henderson reveal that the Oakland Police Department's investigation into which of its officers shot Marine veteran Scott Olsen with a beanbag round on October 25 may have been compromised by the actions of an officer assigned to the case. "It is alleged an OPD investigator compromised the Scott Olson [sic] criminal investigation," the court document reads. "This will require interviews of several members of CID [Criminal Investigations Division] and Tango Teams [tactical teams armed with less-than-lethal munitions] but will not require any extensive analysis of video or other evidence."

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/opd-screws-up-scott-olsen-investigation/Content?oid=3233648


In February 2012, after reviewing video recordings and other police records, private investigator Jacob Crawford and I identified Roche as the officer who threw the flash-bang grenade at Olsen (see "Officer in Scott Olsen Incident Identified?" 2/22/12). Additional reporting later revealed that OPD had prematurely ended its investigation into the Olsen incident and that the department investigators lied to the Alameda District Attorney's Office about it (see, "OPD Screws Up Scott Olsen Investigation," 6/13/12). OPD's conduct elicited concern from former Baltimore Police Commissioner Tom Frazier, whom the city had hired to review OPD's conduct during Occupy Oakland. Frazier determined that department investigators had "compromised" the probe of the Olsen incident.

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/why-oakland-cant-fire-bad-cops/Content?oid=4074076



03 Oakland Police Dept (OPD) - Occupy Oakland Protester / Iraq War Vet Critically Injured - $4.5M

March 2014
Occupy protester wounded by Oakland police gets $4.5 million
$4.5 million to settle suit by vet shot at Occupy rally

http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Occupy-protester-wounded-by-Oakland-police-gets-5337743.php



OPD Response during Occupy Oakland resulted in a $1.4m lawsuit (after they critically injured war vet Scott Olsen)  There were also reports of journalists being jailed and an injury of a 15 year old protester 


​A United States military veteran who was critically injured by the police during an Occupy Wall Street protest in October 2011 will be awarded $4.5 million by the city of Oakland, California.

The incident occurred less than five weeks after the Occupy movement started on the other side of the country in New York City’s Zuccotti Park, and was among several similar incidents that solidified focus on one of many issues the group for the most part rallied against: the excessive use of force by ever increasingly militarized police forces across the country.

https://www.rt.com/usa/occupy-scott-olsen-settlement-433/

Oakland police used "an overwhelming military-type response" to disperse Occupy Oakland demonstrators and fired at a former Marine and Iraq war veteran who was critically injured in the clashes in October, according to a report issued on Monday.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-occupy-oakland-idUSBRE84008320120501


May 2010 - Another injury from OPD response 

student falls from I-880 highway overpass during Occupy Oakland Protest

As police were attacking the crowd, Francois Zimany, a fifteen-year old high school student, fractured his skull after a 25-30 foot fall off the freeway. Questions have arisen over whether he fell, jumped, or was pushed by police off of the freeway.

https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/03/05/18639862.php


January 2012

Journalists arrested at Occupy Oakland Protest

All of the journalists arrested over the weekend who spoke to Oakland North said they tried to identify themselves to police as reporters.

“I showed [an officer] my press pass and asked if I could get out of here and he said no,” Hanes said. “Then I asked if I could talk to a sergeant and he said no.”

The trio next went to an officer who was arresting protestors, but the cop rejected their press passes.

http://oaklandnorth.net/2012/01/31/journalists-arrested-at-saturday-occupy-oakland-protest/

http://oaklandnorth.net/2010/03/12/student-perspective-on-march-4-during-the-freeway-takeover-some-reporters-got-the-story-four-of-them-got-arrested/


Oakland changes crowd control policy

OPD’s handling of Occupy Oakland protests has led to two investigations, one conducted internally by the department, and one by a federal monitor. The results of each investigation are expected to be released soon, Jordan said Monday. He said the changes to the existing crowd control policy are part of a larger effort by the department to be in compliance with the 2003 negotiated settlement agreement stemming from the “Riders” lawsuit.

https://oaklandnorth.net/2012/04/23/opd-changing-its-crowd-control-policy/


Indpendent Report: Flawed response by Oakland Police to October 25 "Occupy Oakland" Protest. 

Oakland Police, Mayor, Administrator Say Reforms arleady in progress. Pledge Continued Improvements

Indpendent reports commissioned by the City Administrator confirmed that the Oakland Police Department's respose to the Occupy Oakland protest on October 25 last year was flawed by inadequate staffing, insuffient planning, lack of understanding of modern crowd management techniques, and outdated policies and protocals


https://www.scribd.com/document/97137127/City-of-Oakland-Findings-on-independent-report-investigating-OPD-handling-of-Occupy-protesters