Monday, January 2, 2017

101 Oakland Bldg Dept (OBD) - does not understand their role in enforcing RRP rules (lead paint laws)

Email threads attempting to explain the various lead laws to the City of Oakland

From: Flynn, Rachel [mailto:RFlynn@oaklandnet.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:47 PM
Cc: McElhaney, Lynette; Willis, Sherri, Public Health, OOD; Crosby, David, CDA; Kalb, Dan; Weintraub, Max; Schaaf, Libby; Hom, Donna; Taylor, Kevin; Morris, William@CSLB; helpline@arb.ca.gov; Luby, Oliver; Brady@cslb.ca.gov; ACRU@dir.ca.gov; eberg@dir.ca.gov; LETF@dir.ca.gov; SHSB@dir.ca.gov; Gallo, Noel; Brooks, Desley; Reid, Larry; Eric Rasmussen; Sam Levin; alan.wang@abc.com; Landreth, Sabrina; Low, Tim; Taylor, Marie (Allene); Labayog, Edward; Minor, Gregory; Brooks, Larry, CDA

The City doesn’t handle the lead paint program, that is handled by the County of Alameda. 

Larry Brooks is the contact.  He is copied here - Larry.Brooks@acgov.org

Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 1:35 PM
To: Flynn, Rachel
Cc: McElhaney, Lynette; Willis, Sherri, Public Health, OOD; Crosby, David, CDA; Kalb, Dan; Weintraub, Max; Schaaf, Libby; Hom, Donna; Taylor, Kevin; Morris, William@CSLB; helpline@arb.ca.gov; Luby, Oliver; Brady@cslb.ca.gov; ACRU@dir.ca.gov; eberg@dir.ca.gov; LETF@dir.ca.gov; SHSB@dir.ca.gov; Gallo, Noel; Brooks, Desley; Reid, Larry; Eric Rasmussen; Landreth, Sabrina; Low, Tim; Taylor, Marie (Allene); Labayog, Edward; Minor, Gregory

I have no idea why I'm having to explain State and Federal laws regarding construction to the Oakland Building Department:

Title 17 - California LBP Work Practice Requirements AND the EPA RRP regulations must be followed

http://www.homesafetraining.com/pdfs/CAregsHandOut.pdf
http://www.achhd.org/leadpoisoning/regs.htm

Lead-based Paint Work Practices in California

This handout is designed to help contractors understand California’s lead-based paint (LBP) work practice requirements.

These regulations are separate from EPA’s RRP Rule and have been in effect for a number of years.

References:

Title 17, CCR, Div 1, Ch 8, Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for Lead-Based Paint and Lead Hazards 

SB 460, the Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard)

You must presume that any untested surface coating in all pre-78 structures is Lead Based Paint.  

This applies to everyone in the state - not just contractors - and covers all structures - not just Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities.

So, any time you work in a pre-78 structure in CA that has not been tested, you must presume all surfaces are covered with lead-based paint.(HSI)

If you disturb ANY AMOUNT of known lead-based paint or presumed lead-based paint in a structure in California, you must:

  • contain the work area
  • use lead safe work practices
  • make sure there is no visible dust or debris at the end of your project
  • demonstrate compliance with containment and lead safe work practices if asked by the California Department of Public Health or a local enforcement agency
  • This applies to all structures, no matter how small the job. It also applies even if there is no compensation involved


“Containment” means a system, process, or barrier used to contain lead hazards inside a work area such as described in “Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing”, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, June 1995, Chapter 8, Containment and Barrier Systems, Tables 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, or “Guide for Preparing Surface Preparation Debris Generated During Paint Removal Operations”, Society for Protective Coatings, Technology Guide 6, October 1, 2004

It is ILLEGAL to have or create a lead hazard in California 
You can’t create a lead hazard, no matter what. A lead hazard is any amount of deteriorated lead based paint, lead-contaminated dust, lead-contaminated soil, or disturbing lead-based paint or presumed lead-based paint without containment

“Lead Contaminated Dust” Dust on inside floors is “lead-contaminated” when there are 40 micrograms of lead per square foot of surface. On other horizontal surfaces inside, the level is 250 micrograms per square foot. All outside levels are hazardous at 400 micrograms per square foot.
“Lead Contaminated Soil” Soil is “lead-contaminated” in play areas - or areas children are likely to be - when it contains 400 ppm of lead. In all other areas, soil is “lead contaminated” at 1000 ppm.
California considers lead hazard in a residence “substandard housing.”

California Contractors may NOT test paint for lead.
Only California-certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessors may take lead paint, dust or soil samples in public or residential buildings if compensation is involved.

RRP contractors may NOT test paint in California. They must assume it is lead-based
.
However, testing components removed from residential or public buildings to determine if hazardous waste requirements apply IS allowed. (HSI)
This exemption only applies to building materials that are already removed from a structure and awaiting disposal.

Contractors with employees must follow the Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard
The Lead in Construction Standard (SB 460) covers all employees who might be exposed to any amount of lead in a construction setting, including construction, demolition, alteration and maintenance. The California standard is almost identical to the Federal rules.

Employers are required to test the air to see how much lead dust workers are exposed to. The more lead there is, the more the employer must protect his workers. If air tests have NOT been done, the employer must assume the amount of lead in the air is unsafe, and put his workers in suits and respirators (HSI). 

Employers are also required to have hand washing facilities and HEPA vacuums at all jobs.

So, employers must:
test the air
provide hand washing facilities
use a HEPA vacuum

If workers perform a Trigger Task, the employer must do more. Trigger Task are things like sanding, scraping and manual demolition. If Trigger Tasks are performed, the employer must also:
have a worker’s blood tested when the worker is hired
establish a “regulated area” with limited access and signs
train employees about the Lead in Construction Standard
notify Cal/OSHA 24 hours in advance of jobs that disturb more than 100 square or linear feet.

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:33 PM, M Hennings <melissa.hennings@gmail.com> wrote:

Title 17 - Lead-based Paint Work Practices in California - It is illegal to have or create a lead hazard in California

Lead-based Paint Work Practices in California

(References: Title 17, CCR, Div 1, Ch 8, Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for

Lead-Based Paint and Lead Hazards and SB 460, the Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard)

CALIFORNIA

In every structure built prior to 1978: 


  • Assume untested paint is lead-tested
    OR
  • Have paint tested by a State-Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor 


In every structure built prior to 1978, if any untested paint will be disturbed: 

  • Use containment
  • Use Lead Safe Work Practices
  • Be able to demonstrate compliance 

For all construction employees who might be exposed to ANY amount of lead

  • Employer tests air to determine level of worker protection

Until air tests are taken, workers must be in suits and respirators

  • Hand washing facilities provided
  • Use HEPA vacuum

For all employees doing a Trigger Task (sanding, scraping, demolition)

  • Blood test when hired
  • Regulated area at every job
  • Trained about Lead in Construction Standard


Cal/OSHA must be notified if job over 100 square or linear feet

FEDERAL

In Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities (if compensation & disturbing more than 6 square feet)


  • Give client 'Renovate Right' before beginning job (get a signed receipt)
  • Work for an EPA-certified RRP firm
  • Become individually certified renovator
  • Use containment,l lead safe work practices
  • Train all non-certified workers (HSI) 
  • Do cleaning verification at end of job, or have clearance test


100 Oakland Bldg Dept (OBD) - Refuses to enforce Lead Laws - Alameda HH can only enforce those involving lead poisoned children

The Alameda County Healthy Homes Department includes the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program.  Under this program we have some enforcement authority to bring property owners into compliance when a lead poisoned child has been identified as living in their building.

In regards to Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP), we have no enforcement authority but we successfully address most cases of unsafe lead abatement practices through education and prevention.

For example we offer Environmental Protection Agency approved RRP courses to property owners, building inspectors, code enforcement officers, contractors, etc to educate them in lead safe abatement practices. And we recently began asking all Chief Building Officials in the County to require individuals to sign a “RRP acknowledgement” form when obtaining building permits (see attached).

I look forward to communicating with you directly along with David Crosby of our office who you are already familiar with.

Larry

Larry Brooks, Director of Operations
Alameda County Healthy Homes Department
2000 Embarcadero, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94606
510-567-8282  Fax: 510-567-8272
http://www.achhd.org/

The Alameda County Healthy Homes Department– provides innovative, multi-disciplinary programs that offer consultations, case management, technical assistance, and services to prevent lead poisoning and promote health and safety in the home.

99 Oakland Bldg Dpt (OBD) - Refusing to enforce existing lead paint laws.. or really any laws

To: Flynn, Rachel
Cc: McElhaney, Lynette; Willis, Sherri, Public Health, OOD; Crosby, David, CDA; Kalb, Dan; Weintraub, Max; Schaaf, Libby; Hom, Donna; Taylor, Kevin; Morris, William@CSLB; helpline@arb.ca.gov; Luby, Oliver; Brady@cslb.ca.gov; ACRU@dir.ca.gov; eberg@dir.ca.gov; LETF@dir.ca.gov; SHSB@dir.ca.gov; Gallo, Noel; Brooks, Desley; Reid, Larry; Eric Rasmussen; Sam Levin; alan.wang@abc.com; Landreth, Sabrina; Low, Tim; Taylor, Marie (Allene); Labayog, Edward; Minor, Gregory
Subject: Oakland Ignores Lead Paint Laws 

Title 17 - Lead-based Paint Work Practices in California:
It is illegal to have or create a lead hazard in California

Lead-based Paint Work Practices in California
(References: Title 17, CCR, Div 1, Ch 8, Accreditation, Certification and Work Practices for
Lead-Based Paint and Lead Hazards and SB 460, the Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard)

CALIFORNIA

In every structure built prior to 1978: 
  • Assume untested paint is lead-tested
    OR
  • Have paint tested by a State-Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor 


In every structure built prior to 1978, if any untested paint will be disturbed: 
  • Use containment
  • Use Lead Safe Work Practices
  • Be able to demonstrate compliance 


For all construction employees who might be exposed to ANY amount of lead
  • Employer tests air to determine level of worker protection

Until air tests are taken, workers must be in suits and respirators
  • Hand washing facilities provided
  • Use HEPA vacuum


For all employees doing a Trigger Task (sanding, scraping, demolition)
  • Blood test when hired
  • Regulated area at every job
  • Trained about Lead in Construction Standard
  • Cal/OSHA must be notified if job over 100 square or linear feet

FEDERAL

In Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities (if compensation & disturbing more than 6 square feet)

  • Give client 'Renovate Right' before beginning job (get a signed receipt)
  • Work for an EPA-certified RRP firm
  • Become individually certified renovator
  • Use containment,l lead safe work practices
  • Train all non-certified workers (HSI) 
  • Do cleaning verification at end of job, or have clearance test



On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Flynn, Rachel <RFlynn@oaklandnet.com> wrote:

Tim, Marie, and Ed – Please see Councilmember McElhaney’s e-mail below.  Can we start to impose fines for the reported violations, i.e., soil on the sidewalks, sidewalk obstructions (apparently without permits), and window frames removed that have lead paint.  The reference to “lead abatement” in e-mails, I believe refers to lead paint being removed (scraped) from a painted object.  If the entire object, i.e., a window, is being removed, then I believe that is permitted. 

Please check on any applicable laws that might apply to the removal of an object covered in lead paint. 


From: McElhaney, Lynette 
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:44 AM
Cc: Flynn, Rachel; Willis, Sherri, Public Health, OOD; Crosby, David, CDA; Kalb, Dan; Weintraub, Max; Schaaf, Libby; Hom, Donna; Taylor, Kevin; Morris, William@CSLB; helpline@arb.ca.gov; Luby, Oliver; Brady@cslb.ca.gov; ACRU@dir.ca.gov; eberg@dir.ca.gov; LETF@dir.ca.gov; SHSB@dir.ca.gov; Gallo, Noel; Brooks, Desley; Reid, Larry; Eric Rasmussen; Sam Levin; alan.wang@abc.com; Landreth, Sabrina


Rachel,

Please provide a comprehensive assessment and response to the Council and the constituent.  There is no mention of how the environmental harms are being addressed nor any mention of fines being imposed for work that initially began unpermitted.  Although this is in District 1, we have found similar projects happening in District 3 where contractors are allowed to proceed without proper permit, without finaling demo permits, without obtaining obstruction permits, without testing and/or remediation of lead etc.  

It appears that there is no penalty for not complying with applicable law and those who proceed are rewarded by getting staff's investment of time and expertise without penalty.  We need to correct this.

I have cc'd Sabrina to bring her into this chain.  It is important to figure out how to address the concerns on this site as well as how to improve our ability to respond to future incidents.

Thanks much for your attention to this matter.  Kind regards, Lynette

Sent by Council President Lynette Gibson McElhaney from my iPad. Please excuse any typos or errors.
Lead-Safe Housing and Lead Hazards
(California Civil Code 1941.1; California Health & Safety Code 17961, 17980, 124130, 17920.10, 105251 to 105257)                                                                                                                                                                          
Deems a building to be in violation of the State Housing Law if it contains lead hazards, and requires local enforcement agencies to enforce provisions related to lead hazards

Makes it a crime for a person to engage in specified acts related to lead hazard evaluation, abatement, and lead-related constructions courses, unless certified or accredited by the Department.
Permits local enforcement agencies to order the abatement of lead hazards or issue a cease and desist order in response to lead hazards.

California Health and Safety Code, and State Housing Law
State codes and laws now make existing lead hazards, or creating a lead hazard, a violation subject to fines and/or imprisonment. This means that pre-1978 homes should be maintained so that they are lead-safe, with the paint intact. It also means that if you are conducting activities that disturb painted surfaces on a pre-1978 building, you must take steps to contain the paint chips and dust. There are also some prohibited renovation activities. Alameda County Lead Poisoning Prevention Program offers classes in lead-safe work practices for property owners and contractors.

For more complete information on California lead laws and regulations:
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/CLPPB/Pages/AboutCLPPB.aspx#CAstatutes
Assembly Bill 2861 (passed in 2006) increased the penalty for failing to cease an activity that creates a lead hazard after receiving an order of violation by establishing a fine of as much as $5,000 or six months in jail or both for the second order of violation.

If you are a:
This regulation may apply to you:
Contractor
Painter
Maintenance worker
Owner Occupant Homeowner:

Conducting home improvements:
Rental Property Owner:

Conducting repairs:




Section 8 participant:

California Lead Poisoning Prevention Regulations

 Title 17
California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section 35001 et seq (PDF)
For more information, see the Lead-Related Construction pages.
Requirements for lead hazard evaluation and abatement activities, accreditation of training providers, and certification of individuals engaged in lead-based paint activities.
Title 8
California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1532.1 et seq

Worker protection requirements for employees conducting lead-related construction activities.

Lead-Safe Housing and Lead Hazards(California Civil Code 1941.1California Health & Safety Code 179611798012413017920.10105251 to 105257)                                                                                                                                                                       
Deems a building to be in violation of the State Housing Law if it contains lead hazards, and requires local enforcement agencies to enforce provisions related to lead hazards. Makes it a crime for a person to engage in specified acts related to lead hazard evaluation, abatement, and lead-related constructions courses, unless certified or accredited by the Department. Permits local enforcement agencies to order the abatement of lead hazards or issue a cease and desist order in response to lead hazards.

Lead-Related Activities in Construction Work
(California Labor Code 6716 to 6717)
Provides for the establishment of standards that protect the health and safety of employees who engage in lead-related construction work, including construction, demolition, renovation and repair.
Lead in Plumbing(California Health & Safety Code 116875 to 116880)Requires the use of lead-free pipes and fixtures in any installation or repair of a public water system or in a facility where water is provided for human consumption.
Occupational Lead Poisoning Prevention
(California Health & Safety Code 105185 to 105197) Establishes an occupational lead poisoning prevention program to register and monitor laboratory reports of adult lead toxicity cases, monitor reported cases of occupational lead poisoning to ascertain lead poisoning sources, conduct investigations of take-home exposure cases, train employees and health professionals regarding occupational lead poisoning prevention, and recommended means for lead poisoning prevention.  

98 City of Oakland - Lead Levels dangerously high

January 01, 2017
Oakland’s lead levels are dangerously high

Flint, Mich., is a place that has become synonymous with lead poisoning and governmental failure. Yet an unsettling new report from Reuters has found that thousands of communities around the nation are afflicted with even higher levels of poisoning than Flint — and one of those places is Oakland.

A test of 500 children in the Fruitvale neighborhood of Oakland showed that 7.57 percent of them had elevated lead levels in their blood.

That’s far higher than the nationwide average of 2.5 percent, and it also beats Flint’s atrocious levels of 5 percent during the height of its water crisis in 2014-15.

The Centers for Disease Control recommends a public health response for any child who tests high — and rightfully so.

Even small amounts of lead poisoning can negatively impact entire communities, since small elevations of lead levels in children’s blood can reduce their IQs, stunt their development, and increase the risk of behavioral problems.

Unlike Flint’s, Oakland’s rate is probably the result of benign, rather than active, neglect.

Many lower-income communities are plagued by “legacy lead” that persists in older homes from peeling paint or outdated plumbing, or in industrial waste that’s been left behind by businesses.

But Oakland still has a responsibility to help its residents.

There are federal laws requiring homeowners of properties built before 1978 to disclose lead hazards to tenants or buyers, but when it comes to remediation, most residents are on their own.

The regional housing crisis may exacerbate problems — as more lower-income residents squeeze into housing units, more people may be exposed to lead. And tenants who are worried about losing their housing are less likely to complain to landlords about the need for remediation.

One potential solution for Oakland’s leadership would be to find ways to strengthen the Alameda County Healthy Homes Department’s lead poisoning prevention programs. More funding and more partnerships would help this agency help Oakland’s vulnerable citizens, leading to lower public health bills down the road.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/Oakland-s-lead-levels-are-dangerously-high-10827512.php

97 Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) - Financial Trouble Part 2 (2017)

January 2017
Bailed-out Oakland schools are back in financial trouble

Well before the state had to bail out the Oakland Unified School District in 2003, fiscal experts warned school officials that their overspending was going to land them in big trouble. That didn’t stop the district from running up a $37 million deficit, resulting in a state takeover and record bailout that Oakland Unified is still repaying.

Nearly 14 years later, district officials are once again spending more than they have and acknowledge that urgent action is needed to stave off another fiscal crisis.

As he heads out the door for his new job at the head of the Washington, D.C., schools, Superintendent Antwan Wilson is expected to lay out a dire financial forecast this month showing Oakland’s school spending exceeding its revenue by $30 million next year.

Wilson insists that the situation is different from last decade, when California loaned the district $100 million and removed local control for six years. Back then, the school board was blindsided by an accounting error that hid the true size of Oakland’s deficit, Wilson said in an interview.

This time, there’s a clear picture of a bloated spending plan that well exceeds anticipated incoming cash.

“This is all in front of us,” Wilson said. “This is all preventable.”

Since the state takeover, district accounting systems have been tightened and oversight from the Alameda County Office of Education is more thorough. And a trustee appointed by the California Department of Education continues to monitor district finances — oversight required until the $100 million bailout loan is paid off, which should be in 2026.

Still, there are striking similarities between the current situation and what was happening in the early 2000s.

Back then, the district was eating into its reserve fund to cover special education programs and cafeteria costs, outside auditors found. A large raise for teachers was requiring creative accounting, and declining enrollment was a big worry.

Now: The district has eaten into its reserve fund, in part to cover special education and cafeteria cost overruns. The school board has agreed to a 14 percent raise for teachers over three years, although it’s contingent on increases in state funding.

And enrollment declined this year to 36,668 students — 850 fewer than Wilson expected. That will soon cost the district about $10 million annually in state funding, a total that will worsen if enrollment drops further.

Even without the enrollment hit, the district is operating with a $500,000 structural deficit, meaning it’s spending that much more than it’s taking in.

As in the early 2000s, the superintendent and school board have pushed policies and programs to improve schools while boosting worker pay — good intentions lacking sufficient funds.


http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Bailed-out-Oakland-schools-are-back-in-financial-10830011.php

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

96 Oakland City Council - interfering with a project on 32nd street

January 2014
email to Maurice Brenyah-Addow

I just want to keep you informed. I got one negative call back and it's the house directly to the right of me if you're standing on the street. I don't know the address. It was the husband, and he claimed his wife was on the Oakland city Council. He said he would support 3 units not 5.  I let him know we have zoning for 8 and we were keeping the project to a minimum as it was. So he threatened that his wife knows the whole city council blah blah blah.


http://documents.scribd.com.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/6r5f3mchj44bbvdv.pdf

Sunday, December 25, 2016

95 Oakland Bldg Dept (OBD) - North Oakland House collapses nearly crushing occupant

April 2015
Contractor Says Collapsed Oakland House Was Accident Waiting To Happen, Inspectors Look For Violations

OAKLAND (KPIX 5) — Cal/OSHA and city inspectors are investigating for potential violations by contractors after a North Oakland home collapsed Thursday, nearly crushing a person inside. A veteran contractor who examined this house told KPIX 5 that workers failed to brace the wall framing, which could have led to the collapse.

The collapse trapped Bubba Powell, a local homeless man who was hired by the contractor to keep squatters away. He was not seriously hurt.

A Marin County construction company bought the home last year for $430,000 to fix the home and flip it.

They lifted up the house and poured a new foundation, but neighbors said it was supported by some flimsy scaffolding.

Licensed contractor Juan Hernandez examined the house. He says the contractors who did the framing also failed to brace the 2×4 studs.

“They don’t have the braces to support the temporary wall. They have to have a crossbar to support, for the wall to not move like this,” Hernandez told KPIX 5.

Next door neighbor Michael Davies says work stopped on the house and it was left off the ground for the last five weeks.

Hernandez said that’s way too long. “They just left it raised for too long. It was an accident waiting to happen,” he said.

Contractor Tim Peterson told KPIX 5 there were braces, and he’s not sure what happened to them, but he wouldn’t answer any other questions. The city is investigating whether he had the right permit.

The collapse partially crushed part of Davies’ home, causing it to be red-tagged by the city. Davies’ said the contractor of the collapsed house offered to fix it. “He was saying, ‘Well, looks like I’m gonna be fixing your house next.’ And I said, ‘I don’t know, not the way yours was falling down’” he recalled.

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/04/03/contractor-collapsed-oakland-house-accident-waiting-to-happen-cal-osha-violations/